>>"Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Junichi> I think this was discussed enough in -devel already, but
Junichi> some good points about /libexec was given. I've noticed
Junichi> that some known good practice is not documented in policy,
Firstly, there is no such consensus that I can see. Secondly,
I have not seen any technical reason to make Packages
change. Thirdly, get a rough consensus on -devel, get the packages to
change, and _then_ we propose a should clause.
Junichi> and I propose the following patch:
This is way premature.
manoj
--
What fools these morals be!
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
