> I do not see why we should use which. As I have stated previously, we > already require feature sets (set -e in particular) in the new POSIX > document which imply the existence of type(1). So type should be
Can we codify this better? > the preferred utility for this task. Besides, as an external utility, > which(1) does not know about shell builtins, which is actually bad. This depends on the user's perspective. I can't imagine ever wanting to do anything other than 'test -x /absolute/path' in a postinst. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
