> The policy explicitly mentions that set -e is to be used. Have > we collectively taken leave of common sense?
No, it mentions that set -e SHOULD be used in some cases. The fact that it mentions /bin/sh in context with 'set -e' might be a bit confusing, but I don't think that that overrides the declaration that #!/bin/sh scripts MUST not use set -e. > For the former. For the latter, if it really confuses soemone > whether set -e is to be used or not, I suggest they stop > being a developer and take up some other hobby, like being a lawyer. There's no confusion. set -e is expressly forbidden. Perhaps those persons who prefer forbidding something while claiming that common sense allows it, to achieving some sort of consistency, should become lawyers or perhaps government officials. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
