On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:56:12AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > I'd be happy with SUSv3, UP relevant to non-interactive use, and the > appropriate subset of XSI. Of course, you realize that this reverses > the 'echo -n' exception and that people will cry.
I have nothing against keeping the echo -n clause. > The other problem, then, is that we will have a situation wherein no shell > in Debian would be suitable as /bin/sh (unless I'm assuming incorrectly > about pdksh). Please be more specific. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
