On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:07, Joey Hess wrote: [script should not blow away local issues or modifications]
> None of that should probably be blown away. Deleting all symlinks and > then checking what's left and either giving up or taking some smart > action with the remainder, perhaps? Do we really have to enforce the FHS on users' systems? If we remove all the symlinks in /usr/doc (which should be all that is in there from up-to-date Debian packages, right?), check if /usr/doc is empty, and remove it if so, shouldn't that be enough? There's no reason even to ask if the admin wants to blow away /usr/doc, IMO. The base-files' NEWS.Debian could mention that /usr/doc is now no longer part of Debian, and anything in it can be removed or moved elsewhere with no ill effects on any Debian packages. -- Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
