On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 08:10:08PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > FYI this priority is defined by the Policy. You can't increase this > > priority for your convenience. > > Ugh. I consider that a bug in policy. It should allow more discretion > for the individual maintainers. > > Or at least it should say something like "If the window manager complies > with the Window Manager Specification Project, developed by the Free > Desktop Group, then add 30 points." > > If that makes sense to people, I'll propose a policy amendment to that > effect.
If you wanna take the time to write the necessary changes to the policy
language, you can count me as a second. It's imporant that the emerging
standards be emphasised. They are being created for a reason, after all.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My opinions are always right
Windows: Where do you want to go today?
MacOS: Where do you want to be tomorrow?
Linux: Are you coming or what?
-- Linux Journal
pgpkE5LpCB35U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
