On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:20:14PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > + The system administrator should be able to delete files in > + `/usr/share/doc' without causing any programs to break. A package > + should not directly reference files that it places there.
Sure it should: ``further documentation may be found in /usr/share/doc/foo''. Better would probably be to say "A package should not require the existance of any files in /usr/share/doc to run." Which is pretty much repeating yourself, if that matters. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''