Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If -policy wants to run a flame war
Hey, who ever wants a flame war? > on this topic now, knock yourselves out, but can we please leave the > bts report off the cc, and probably also the OP (who I can't speak > for) and myself (who I just have ;). > > As I've said before, I'll be incorporating the findings of the OP > re portablility into the next package and uploading it arch: any. Well I think that's great and if you read what I said, I had always agreed that in the instance of this package, there doesn't seem to be any serious porting barriers in the code (just the build system, it seemed), and thus it ought to be ported, even forked as necessary. Although I will add on this point Ron that it is also part of your duty here, IMHO, to submit the build portability and other useful patches upstream. I think I can assert that w/o controversy. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
