Hello, On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:06:35AM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > If you could (a) convert this into a proper policy change proposal, See my notes below.
> (b) fix the /usr/share/foo where you meant /usr/share/doc/foo,
Yes, of course it was meant to read /usr/share/doc/foo
> and (c)
> describe what goes in /usr/share/doc/foo-doc (just changelog and
> README.Debian pointing to /usr/share/doc/foo?),
That would be fine with me. But do we really need to
regulate this?
> I would be willing to secondary the proposal...
Fine :-)
Regaring a "policy change proposal": wasn't it the way, that policy
should document current practice? At the moment there are a lot
of packages which put their documenation into /usr/share/doc/foo-doc.
So maybe that should not be policy, but something different (some
kind of a recommendation)?
What do you think,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
pgp5I9693niYE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
