Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In that case, the buildds are broken: they don't install > > Build-Depends-Indep, even though they do invoke the clean and build > > targets of debian/rules (through dpkg-buildpackage). See > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=freesci&ver=0.3.4a-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1043707174&file=log&as=raw > > for an example of this. > > Correct.
No, it's not correct. The buildds are not broken, they're doing exactly what they've always done; you can't change policy and then declare that the buildds are broken because they don't follow how you've changed policy. Policy reflects current practice, remember? -- James
