Your message dated Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:36:31 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#186119: debian-policy: libc6-migration is no longer
necessary?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 16:55:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 24 10:55:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail1.dac.neu.edu [129.10.1.75] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xVEL-0004QG-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:55:25 -0600
Received: from darth.ns ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail1.dac.neu.edu with ESMTP id LAA15557;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:55:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darth.ns ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by darth.ns (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h2OGtOeE027011;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:55:24 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by darth.ns (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id h2OGtNg2027009;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:55:23 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: libc6-migration is no longer necessary?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:55:23 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,PGP_SIGNATURE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.9.0
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nothing has been linked against libc5 for many Debian versions now,
why is libc6-migration.txt still included in the debian-policy package?
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux darth 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sun Mar 2 20:39:17 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+fzh7wO+u47cOQDsRApfPAJ0bFWsHW9vKGeklbCJgrJwiM/2v1wCgllWn
TpR65t/9od/AXVuDfx2mSBs=
=3IX4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 186119-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2003 09:41:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 03:41:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18yTso-0002Ch-00; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:41:15 -0600
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
h2R9aWfW020798
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:36:32 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id
h2R9aVV5020794;
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:36:31 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50.17 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#186119: debian-policy: libc6-migration is no longer
necessary?
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Thu Mar 27 03:36:31 2003
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:36:31 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mark Brown's message of
"Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:52:21 +0000")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:52:21 +0000,
>> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:55:23AM -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
>> Nothing has been linked against libc5 for many Debian versions
>> now, why is libc6-migration.txt still included in the
>> debian-policy package?
> There's still at least one altdev package for libc5 remaining in
> the archive (zlib1-altdev, which I maintain) as well asl libc5
> itself.
And it still serves as a model for future migrations ;-)
manoj
--
If a fool persists in his folly he shall become wise. William Blake
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
