(Note that I'm subscribed to the list, no need to mail me personally.) On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:58:49 -0500 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote: > > Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common > > practise, upping it to 128x128 will give us a bit more leeway. > > Why not just use SVG and eliminate the whole problem?
Reality :) But "128x128 or SVG" is fine.
pgptrUdIpbYhv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
