On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:26:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:33:01PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > In light of recent changes, I suggest that policy should instead say: > > > > > > How about we just remove the whole section? The software now makes it > > > clear > > > that the old stuff is a bug, and it's not like we need the Policy Manual > > > to say "fix the obvious bug".
I concur, although perhaps it's still valuable to leave the libtermcap comments there since it (presumably) doesn't trigger a compiler warning in the same way. > > Maybe we should wait a bit before remove it ? See how many > > packages are affected, what feed back we get, etc... > > Well, that's my point. No packages should be affected -- in fact in sid > I see only one dependency on termcap-compat, cmucl-source. I doubt there > are many more sources using varargs.h, but I don't have numbers, so that > might have to be investigated further. I filed this bug after running into xisp, which uses it. I don't recall encountering anything similar before, although of course the compiler change is very recent. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
