On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:23:36PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:13:37 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Also "should accept one argument, saying what to do:" should be > > explicit about if it is at least one, or only one. > Sorry, I don't understand. What do you want? Overspecification of irrelevent details, as near as I can make out. Dan, policy's job is not to tell you what's allowed. Policy's job is to tell you what's required, and what's forbidden, and that's pretty much it. If you want to add 700 optional arguments to your init scripts, go for it. As long as it does the proper thing when fed the standard required arguments, nobody will care. And because nobody cares...it's not a policy issue. cheers -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
