severity 188731 wishlist
thanks

Hi,

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:24:12 +0200, Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: 

> Section 11.2 says

>       strip --strip-unneeded your-lib

> Lintian, however, complains if the sections .comment or .note are
> present, which strip doesn't think are unneeded.

        Usually, when there is a discrepancy between lintian and
 policy, it is not policy that you change.

> I don't know whether this is a bug in policy, strip, or lintian, but
> since Debian's "install -s" and dh_strip both use the additional
> options

>       --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note

> I think that it's a policy bug.

        Changing this without a transition plan would mean that a
 number of packages would be rendered buggy (all my C packages, most
 of whom rely on upstream Makefiles install target, and do not call
 install directly). 

        How many packages would be affected? 

        manoj
-- 
If you don't have time to do it right, where are you going to find the
time to do it over?
Manoj Srivastava   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply via email to