On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > noowner 185943 > noowner 208010 > noowner 208011 > thanks > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:31:24 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owner' > > (regardless of the fact that there isn't another good way just at the > > moment). > > "The owner of a bug claims responsibility for fixing it [...]" > > I thought I tried to do this.
I'm not sure I understand how you can claim responsibility for fixing (i.e. uploading new policy, rather than just sending a patch for) a policy bug ...? Well, whatever. Hopefully we'll have subscription sometime soon. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
