Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:49:38PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: >> [policy 3.1.2] >> > I would suggest using 0.YYYYMMDD to avoid using epoch when upstream >> > finally decides to use version 1.0 instead. >> >> What's wrong with using an epoch? > > Most people would prefer not use them if they can avoid it. > I suppose they are rather ugly and they need to be explained to people > outside of Debian.
And somehow 0.YYYYMMDD is more elegant or requires less explanation? -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
