Ben Finney writes ("Re: Bug#331532: [PROPOSAL ] change §10. 4 "set -e OR
check return status" to AND or be rewritten"):
> Not in policy, IMO. I'd like to keep that camel's nose out of the
> tent.
It's already there and has been for years. The important thing is to
have only the nose and not the whole camel.
> Policy can refer the reader to a separate document with good
> programming guides, or "here's a document listing things that are just
> programming bugs anyway".
Such guides inevitably become very long and no-one reads them.
Ian.
