On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:01:22AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > IMHO, Yes. IMHO you should also add that you are only to use numbers without > zero padding (not that the tools will break if you pad, AFAIK, but...), that > they must increase monotonically, that NMUs start with 1 and binary NMUs > start with 0.1 if there isn't a NMU version yet, or <NMU>.1 if there is one.
How about numbering for native packages? People seem to be disagreeing alot on how to do that: Should I add a debian reversion or not? Say the version is 1.2, and I do an NMU, would I call it: - 1.2-0.1 - 1.2-1.1 - 1.2.0.1 - 1.2.1 - 1.3 - Something else? If I number it 1.2-0.1, it would mean it's no longer a native package. Does that mean I should split it in an .orig.tar.gz and a diff? What about binNMU's for those packages? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
