Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what we have so far. > > > Draft 0.3 [2005-12-13] (Only covers Apps) > > Section: Apps/Databases > Description: Interactive database programs, including collection managers, > bibliography tools etc. > Example apps: gaby, alexandria, mdbtools > [...] > Section: Apps/Misc [WAS TOOLS] > Description: Simple apps that don't fit elsewhere. Usage of this section is > dicouraged. [...] > Section: Apps/Office > Description: Office suites, address books, CRM, financial sofware etc. > Example apps: openoffice.org, koffice, gnome-office
Where would timetable managers (KOrganizer...), group task trackers, etc. be sorted, both one-person-standalone, group-wise-networked, and connect-me-to-my-palm, or allinone? I guess dictionaries, thesauri etc. are best in databases, but maybe the name should somehow give a hint to that; to me "databases" sounds much like mysql, M$Access and all that stuff I never use and know nothing about, and I think we would serve our users to give the section a more "end user" friendly name. What about "data management"? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
