Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The description of "Data analysis" could be: "Software designed for > processing, extracting, and presenting generic scientific data."
Yes, sounds good. I also snipped the rest what you said, with approval. > I included a draft for "Science" section below. The descriptions are not > very... descriptive, so care to provide better ones; especially for > "Social". Also please check for any new flaws. > > I am not sure we came to a final agreement on "Mathematics", but I > included it anyway. Note that doing... I must say I don't care too much. If we really have "social", too, then I see no point in making a special case for Math. But if Science is essentially "natural science and engineering", I'd vote to keep Math outside. > Science > Scientific and engineering-related software. This is > a three-level section, do not put entries directly here. > > Astronomy [new] > Astronomy-related software. > celestia, spacechart, stellarium > > Biology [new] > Biology-related software. Analysing sequences, phylogenies, or networks > arb, ncbi-tools-x11, seaview arb, ncbi-tools-x11, seaview, phylip > Chemistry [new] > Chemistry-related software. Drawing and viewing (macro)molecular structures, analysis of spectra, chemical simulation That's too long, isn't it? Shorter, but also more terse: All about (macro)molecules: 2D/3D structures, spectra, simulation I've put all structure viewers into chemistry, even those particularly designed for (biological) macromolecules, because I don't think it makes sense to draw a line between these. The description doesn't specifically mention elements and their properties, but I don't think this is necessary, and we have one PSE-tool in the list. > chemtool, kalzium, xdrawchem polyxmass, xdrawchem, gausssum, kalzium > Mathematics [was:Math] > Mathematics-related software. > gcalctool, snapea, xeukleides xmaxima? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
