On Wed, 09 Aug 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Policy documents reality, so if now the reality is that ~ is > > supported and its use is encouraged, then yes, policy should be > > changed ASAP. > > No. Policy documents what is correct, not just any old broken > thing that is currently being done (not that that is the case here).
Sort of. Refer to update-rc.d, which as currently implemented in Debian AND described in policy is at the very least "an old broken thing that is currently being done". > In this case, ~ provides a mechanism to easily package > pre-release versions, so it is a good thing, it has been in place for > a long time, the semantics are fairly well set, it has been tested > across the whole suite of packaging tools, so yes, now policy should > document it. That was the intended spirit of my reply, which I obviously failed to convey properly. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
