On 27/07/07 at 23:35 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > - What to do if that option is not present? Should a package be > > allowed to build in parallel anyway, determing the number of > > processes itself, or should it be a sequential build? > > I think it should behave as is currently required then; that is to say, > make it a sequential build.
Agreed. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
