Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Bug#443334: policy: postinst abort-remove state."):
> I have lost track of the status of this and I don't know if a Policy
> change is still needed here.  Has this change been made in dpkg?  Is there
> something that should be changed in the Policy wording at this point?

The change to dpkg seems to be blocked since October.  See #432893.

The policy should remain unchanged.  The correct phrasing is indeed
to say that the package `remains installed'.  If the package wasn't
sufficiently close to installed to start with then the postinst won't
be called.

Ian.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to