David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:44:53PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >> The problem I see here is that admin != user in all the situations. >> IMO it should ask, or at least warn, the user and not the admin. >> Because in the end is the user's privacy the one affected, not the >> administrator's. > > You want each package to notify each user? How do you recommend this > actually be carried out? Patching every program?
Using the program's settings facilities. All it has to do is check if the user has already been warned and if not do it, of course only when the program is run. If there's no easy way to do it then just for the sake of simplicity a patch rewriting the 'phoning home' function should be written. IMHO that sounds more reasonable than letting the admin decide about the users privacy. > > - David Nusinow Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
