Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > package debian-policy Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy
> severity 458910 minor Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests. Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > usertag 458910 = normative issue Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests. There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative issue. > retitle 458910 Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests. Changed Bug title to `Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision' from `debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests.'. > merge 458910 186700 Bug#186700: Sorting and meaning of an empty Debian revision is unclear Bug#458910: Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision Merged 186700 458910. > severity 459427 wishlist Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 459427 = normative issue Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative issue. > severity 459868 wishlist Bug#459868: debian-policy: Definition of Maintainer: when using a mailing list Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 459868 = normative proposal Bug#459868: debian-policy: Definition of Maintainer: when using a mailing list There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: proposal normative. > severity 462589 minor Bug#462589: Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for source-only *.changes files Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > usertag 462589 = normative issue Bug#462589: Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for source-only *.changes files There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative issue. > severity 462996 wishlist Bug#462996: Document requirements for copyright file. Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 462996 = normative discussion Bug#462996: Document requirements for copyright file. There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > severity 465140 wishlist Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 465140 = normative discussion Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > retitle 465140 Clarify when alternatives may be used Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives Changed Bug title to `Clarify when alternatives may be used' from `debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives'. > severity 470633 wishlist Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 470633 = informative proposal Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: informative proposal. > retitle 470633 Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed Changed Bug title to `Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed' from `debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed'. > severity 470994 wishlist Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660 Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > usertag 470994 = normative issue Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative issue. > retitle 470994 Mail spool files should be mode 0600 Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660 Changed Bug title to `Mail spool files should be mode 0600' from `mail_spool default mode is 0660'. > usertag 71621 = normative discussion Bug#71621: No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > retitle 71621 Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called Bug#71621: No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives) Changed Bug title to `Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called' from `No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)'. > unmerge 112828 Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts Bug#71621: Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called Disconnected #112828 from all other report(s). > close 112828 Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Hornburg (Racke)) > usertag 458385 = normative proposal Bug#458385: New version of Artistic License There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: proposal normative. > retitle 458385 Include Artistic 2.0 in common-licenses Bug#458385: New version of Artistic License Changed Bug title to `Include Artistic 2.0 in common-licenses' from `New version of Artistic License'. > usertag 458824 = normative discussion Bug#458824: better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > retitle 458824 Specify when and to what RPATH may be set in a binary or > library Bug#458824: better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed Changed Bug title to `Specify when and to what RPATH may be set in a binary or library' from `better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed'. > usertag 466550 = normative discussion Bug#466550: Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > retitle 466550 Clarify or remove the get-orig-source target specification Bug#466550: Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9 Changed Bug title to `Clarify or remove the get-orig-source target specification' from `Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9'. > package debian-policy,python-defaults Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy,python-defaults > usertag 462377 = normative discussion Bug#462377: python-defaults: The de facto Python policy should be blessed "official" There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: normative discussion. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
