Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following patch, from branch bug458910-rra, looks good to > me.
That's two seconds, so I should merge it. Is there some way that I can include the Acked-by information in a merge when I do the merge? Hm, actually, I'm guessing probably not, since that would involve changing the commit, which defeats the whole point of the merge. So... should I just merge this branch (git merge bug458910-rra), rather than doing anything fancy with squash or rebase or anything? This would be my preference; I think it's simpler and easier. But I want to double-check before just going ahead. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
