Russ Allbery wrote:
--- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -8675,6 +8675,68 @@ name ["<var>syshostname</var>"]: for games (X and non-X games) should be installed in <file>/usr/share/man/man6</file>.</p> </sect> + + <sect> + <heading>Web browsers</heading> + + <p> + Some programs have the ability to launch a web browser to + display an URL.
"web browser to display an URL." I don't like the sentence, but anyway I don't worry much, because the program should be sensible, and open browser only with correct protocols. FYI: "xdg-open" could enter in new LSB, as a generic URL opener (not only for browser): http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/xdg-open.html > + Since there are lots of different web browsers > + available in the Debian distribution, the system administrator > + and each user should have the possibility to choose a preferred > + web browser. > +</p> Is "lots of different" correct? Anyway it is a rationale, so I would remove the first part.
+ + <p> + In addition, programs should choose a good default web browser + if none is selected by the user or system administrator. + </p> + + <p> + The recommended way to satisfy these goals is for every program + that launches a web browser with a URL to use the BROWSER + environment variable to determine what browser the user wishes + to use. + </p> + + <p> + The value of BROWSER may consist of a colon-separated series of + browser command parts. These should be tried in order until one + succeeds. A command part consists of the command to executed + followed by 0 or more arguments separated by one or more spaces. + The command and arguments should be separated at the spaces, the + URL added as a final argument, and the resulting command + executed directly (not via the shell).<footnote> + This protects against bugs and security problems caused by + shell metacharacters in the browser arguments or URL. This + specification is compatible with the + <url id="http://www.dwheeler.com/browse/" + name="Alternative Secure BROWSER Definition">. + </footnote> + </p> + + <p> + If the BROWSER environment variable is not set, the program can + use <file>/usr/bin/x-www-browser</file> if DISPLAY is set, and + <file>/usr/bin/www-browser</file> if not. These two files are + managed through the dpkg alternatives mechanism. Thus every + package providing a general-purpose web browser should call the + <prgn>update-alternatives</prgn> program to register the + appopriate one of these alternatives. + </p>
These 4 paragraphs enter to much in details of a program. I'll really remove these paragraphs, and let the programs use only "/usr/bin/sensible-browser" (next paragraph), so it is easier to update the policy (evolution of FreeDesktop, ...). I think that next paragraph is good, and IMO we should not describe rules in details.
+ + <p> + Instead of implementing the above in every program that runs a + web browser, programs in Debian may be configured to use + <file>/usr/bin/sensible-browser</file>. This is a program + provided by the Debian base system that checks the BROWSER + environment variable, falls back to the configured browser in + the user's desktop environment, and then falls back to + <file>/usr/bin/x-www-browser</file> or + <file>/usr/bin/www-browser</file> if BROWSER is not set and no + recognized desktop environment is in use. + </p> + </sect> </chapt>
ok. ciao cate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]