Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#488039: policy: chown uses owner:group not
owner.group"):
> There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
> when talking about the owner and group of a file. People used to use
> that notation to separate the owner and group, and it
> still works, but the proper notation would be "root:root".
What is wrong with <user>.<group> ? I see that it's not currently
documented but it has worked forever and I hope it's not going away.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
