Hi, On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote: > In my opinion it is a way better practise to first update the policy and > then adapt n packages instead of first change them in a way which is > possibly against the policy and expect the policy to be updated > accordingly.
There is nothing _against_ current policy in this proposal. Also it's current
policy (AIUI) that policy is modeled after current best practice and not the
other way around.
> > > With mere "provides:" (a virtual package), you'd have a version of
> > > both exim4 and exim5 that provides default-mta.
In unstable, yes, but where is the problem? And for testing and stable this
MUST be avoided :-)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
