On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I think we're getting bogged down in the debian/copyright discussion,
> and I'm starting to think that some enumeration of what we need
> debian/copyright for would help us figure out what it should actually
> contain.
> 
> I've listed the things that I remember from the relevant threads (and
> my personal recollection):
> 
> 1) DFSG Free licensing of all parts distributed by Debian in main
> 
> 2) License compatibility (both intra-work and inter-work)
> 
> 3) Satisfy licence requirements in binary .debs

More than that, licensing information should be about the binary files,
not the source files.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to