Steve Langasek <[email protected]> writes:

> Robert Collins' suggestion in <1241989292.8026.20.ca...@lifeless-64>
> seems like a good approach for this, then (modulo the syntax bits, and
> putting the tool in the dpkg-* namespace instead of debhelper's
> namespace).

I like this idea on first glance.  It matches what we currently
recommend with dpkg-architecture.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to