Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> writes:

> Yes, and the reason for the multi-line support in this field is a
> technical reason (line too long for gpg/email transport) so I don't
> want to allow it everywhere but only here.

Sorry, I clearly didn't read the original report thoroughly enough.  I
understand better now.

Wouldn't Build-Depends potentially have the same problem for packages
with particularly heavy dependencies?  I suppose we could cross that
bridge when we come to it, though, and realistically Binary is a lot
longer.

Anyway, seconded in principal, although I agree with the wording
commentary previously posted.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to