On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:57:04PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > Even if it's not enforceable, I think something with a more recent > date is better than nothing. So I'm happy with adding a copyright line > for "Debian Policy List Contributors" or something.
That's worse than nothing. There is no entity named "Debian Policy List Contributors" that holds any copyright on this document, and we should not include patently false copyright notices. > Maybe it should be part of the Teams/Policy "constitution" that anyone > contributing to the Debian Policy Manual signs off copyright to the > SPI Inc. I have no objection to assigning the copyright for any of my own contributions to the policy manual, but SPI doesn't have a framework in place for doing copyright assignment today (and even with the FSF, who have quite a bit of experience with this, the copyright assignment process is somewhat onerous). In practice, the only reason we need to care about getting a comprehensive list of copyright holders is if we want to relicense the document, and that requires not only a list of the copyright holders but also a consensus to relicense. So this is really a minor issue. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
