On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:43:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think at this point, now that debconf is mandatory for all but essential > packages, removing the guarantee of a controlling terminal is > uncontroversial. This bug has been open for a while and I'd like to put > it to bed. Here's proposed wording. I'm looking for feedback or seconds.
Should it be spelled out here that in the case of questions that don't have a reasonable default answer (priority high or higher), an acceptable action for the maintainer script to take when running non-interactively is to abort? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
