On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:23:29AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Manoj Srivastava <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug > >> report was, in my opinion, on point: this stuff needs to be written up, > >> and I think that the wiki stuff is already not as good as the README is > >> when it comes to git process (far too many needless merges in that > >> process). If someone is willing to write this up and maintain it in > >> debiandoc, great. Or else perhaps one could reconsider my offer to > >> maintain it in the current form. > > > > I'm fine to maintain it in org-mode. I haven't played with it yet, > > but I'm sure it can't be that hard, and it's not like the details > > change all that much. > > Right. Given that we do have a bug asking for this > documentation, and that this is already written, and no one else has > stepped up to re-write it in another format, I think I shall merge this > branch in, at least as an interim measure. Given that this is not > really policy, but packaging, we can always decide to change our mind.
Well I will do that, but first, I like to be remembered why the old policy-process document has been removed. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
