Bill Allombert <[email protected]> writes: > For my part I would prefer to keep the current policy and use Provides > for non-free software.
I think this would be worse from the perspective of not accidentally getting non-free software. Isn't the package installed by dependency when multiple packages Provide that package non-deterministic? Whereas if you list the free dependency first, you always get it by default if it's satisfiable. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
