Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: wishlist

Dear all,

following the discussion on debian-project, here is a small patch that
clarifies ยง12.5, where it is written that copyrights must be extractable by
mechanical means.

See http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] for the small 
discussion.

With the possible arrival of DEP-5 in the debian-policy package, I think that
it can be good to clarify that what the Policy requires to be
machine-extractable are the copyright files, not their content.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>From 35ae4ecea9c6b26f55d7dc8fdd9ef813fb8fd259 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:28:21 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] What needs to be machine-extractable is the copyright file, 
not its contents.

See: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
---
 policy.sgml |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 6e04c81..2a01b02 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -9630,8 +9630,8 @@ END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
          <file>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var></file> may be a symbolic
          link to another directory in <file>/usr/share/doc</file> only if
          the two packages both come from the same source and the
-         first package Depends on the second.  These rules are
-         important because copyrights must be extractable by
+         first package Depends on the second.  These rules are important
+         because <file>copyright</file> files must be extractable by
          mechanical means.
        </p>
 
-- 
1.7.2.3

Reply via email to