On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:13:32AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > > > although I would of course like if my pet patches (#593909, perhaps > > missing as second, and #609160, that integrates DEP-5 without modifying > > the Policy) were considered, I think that it is very good to go forward > > and publish 3.9.2 as you proposed. > > Those are both in now. :) > > > I am interested in converting the Policy document to Docbook. Do you > > think that it would be good to do it after 3.9.2, or that it would be > > better to wait 3.9.3 that more pending patches are applied ? > > I don't think any of my outstanding patches are particularly bad to port > to a different document format, so at least as far as I'm concerned, you > could go ahead. Although I'm probably not the best person to answer for > this month as I probably won't have much chance to do more Policy work > until May.
If you want, I can take care of uploading 3.9.2. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110406120917.GE3230@yellowpig
