On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:31:51AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Dominic > > Only read trough yet (but not native english speaker): > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Dominic Hargreaves <[email protected]> > > --- > > perl-policy.sgml | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/perl-policy.sgml b/perl-policy.sgml > > index b9f3277..47cf9f6 100644 > > --- a/perl-policy.sgml > > +++ b/perl-policy.sgml > > @@ -461,6 +461,26 @@ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts > > package must depend upon it explicitly. > > </p> > > </sect> > > + > > + <sect id="perl_upgrades"> > > + <heading>Perl Package Upgrades</heading> > > + <p> > > + Starting from <package>perl</package> 5.12.3-2, a dpkg trigger > > + named <var>perl-major-upgrade</var> will be triggered by the > > + postinst of the <package>perl</package> package during major > > + upgrades. Some examples of things which consitute a major upgrade > > consitute -> constitute
Hello Salvatore, Are you willing to second it ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110606182531.GA7512@yellowpig
