Steve Langasek <[email protected]> writes: > I don't think that should be legal either however; we allow "extra > fields" to be added to any paragraph, but I don't believe the intent is > to allow *defined* fields to be used in paragraphs where they are not > specified to be permitted - only to allow new field names to be used. > So I think something like the attached patch should be applied. > Thoughts?
Agreed, I think this would be horribly confusing. I agree with your change here. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
