Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think checkbashisms and posh are an improvement over just suggesting >> bash (and checkbashisms, in particular, is much easier to use), so my >> inclination is to stick with the new wording and leave the further details >> for other tools. > I assume by 'bash' you mean 'dash' above. Yes, sorry. > I would prefer a less specific note: > Checking your script with checkbashisms from the devscripts > package or running your script with an alternate shell such as > posh may help uncover violations of the above requirements. Okay, that seems fine to me. I'll make that change. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
