Patrick Ouellette <[email protected]> writes: > Policy 7.4 states
> "Neither Breaks nor Conflicts should be used unless two packages cannot > be installed at the same time or installing them both causes one of them > to be broken or unusable. Having similar functionality or performing the > same tasks as another package is not sufficient reason to declare Breaks > or Conflicts with that package. " > 7.4 suggests it is appropriate to conflict if a package installs an > executable with the same name as another package but different > functionality. I'm not seeing where it suggests that personally, but I'm probably too close to it. We can certainly add a pointer to 10.1 here. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
