Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > ยง3.7 defines the "base system" as required plus important pacakges. > With this patch, we have the nice definition that "required" implements > the "essential" part, and "important" implements the rest of the base. > I think that it explains better the role of these priorities. By the > way, in the current Policy, the specifications of what the base system > provides are scattered across the document. I am tempted to open a bug > about reorganising this for the version 4.0 of the Policy. Do you think > it would be a good idea ?
Yes, please. I don't know if we'll get to it, but it sounds like something we should look at. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
