https://github.com/infinity0/debian-policy/compare/bug649350-infinity0
I've split up my previous patch into more manageable chunks, and added extra explanations in the commit messages. I'm trying to follow the principle that the commit messages should already contain enough justification for the changes, but if any of them are unclear, please do ask me for further detail. (Further potential additions, which I've omitted for simplicity, include License-Exception: fields, and Location: fields to formalise the concept of a "pointer" to a License.) Ximin On 14/12/12 03:37, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Ximin, > > Ximin Luo wrote: > >> I had been using the SVN for DEP as a baseline for patches, but now I guess >> the >> source code for this is somewhere else - could one of you please point me to >> it? > > Sure. It's at <git://git.debian.org/git/dbnpolicy/policy.git>. > >> Also, shall I continue on this bug report, or shall I start a thread on >> debian-devel@ or debian-projects@? > > This bug (which sends mail to debian-policy@) is fine. > > Do I remember correctly that this report was about introducing a > License-Exception stanza type? > > Thanks, > Jonathan > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50d101f1.4060...@gmx.com
