Bill Allombert wrote: > In that case there could be a udeb subpolicy document maintained by the > d-i team that policy would refer to.
Yeah, that would be fine with me, even though I still don't see the point. Is there a git subpolicy describing how git is packaged? A gnome subpolicy about gnome packaging? The only difference for udebs is that the work is spread over packages throughout the system. They are still maintained by the d-i team. Anyway, I'm not too concerned about that question. What I am concerned about is that the next release of policy should not include wording that requires people to make a decision between ignoring what policy says and filing RC bugs about, e.g., udebs not including changelogs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
