Source: developers-reference Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer,
The current version of the developers-reference contains the following wording in the NMU section: >> or fixes for trivial bugs that blocking a transition, which feels a bit strange. I would suggest "that are blocking", "that blocks", or maybe simply "blocking" See the attached patch against current git for a suggestion on better wording. thanks and best regards -- Andreas Rönnquist [email protected] -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>From bd9d8d20126ed5ee95e6802b2f967cd2fd6adb98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20R=C3=B6nnquist?= <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:03:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix wording in NMU section --- pkgs.dbk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk index 873c42c..a58a9ae 100644 --- a/pkgs.dbk +++ b/pkgs.dbk @@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ Other NMUs: 10 days <para> Those delays are only examples. In some cases, such as uploads fixing security -issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that blocking a transition, it is desirable +issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that blocks a transition, it is desirable that the fixed package reaches <literal>unstable</literal> sooner. </para> -- 2.0.1
