Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> writes: > Imho, we should be making it less ambigious and adjusting our > generated changes and/or debian/changelog to more team maintained > workflows:
> We should unambigiously document: > Maintainer: Typically team (list of names) > Uploads: Typically a subset of team members (list of names) > Changed-by: everyone who contributed changes in this upload (list of names) > Signed-by: person who signed and dput (single uid fingerprint, not > sure we support multi-signed uploads) > GPG Signature itself, should match fingerprint of Singed-by uid > The format of debian/changelog at the moment enforces only one name > and it has no mapping to expose all people involved. > "multi-maintainer changelog" convention of using [ Name [<email>] ] is > good, but is still currently defeated by current single sign-off line > which propagates to Changed-by. I think this would be an interesting direction in which to take things, but it's a larger project that requires changing the definition of fields (Maintainer is currently single-valued) and how various tools work. If you or someone else wanted to pursue this, I think it would be a more accurate representation in the long run, but it may be more effort than is warranted. In the meantime, in the short run, I think we should clarify the wording to something a bit closer to what people normally do. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
