Le Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:08:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > do you have examples of packages having empty fields in source package
> > control
> > files ? I have not found any. (In the sense that a field that only
> > contains
> > a substitution variable is not considered empty).
>
> They come from empty substitutions, yes.
Then they are not empty: there is a big difference between "Depends:" and
"Depends: ${foo}". I think that it would be very confusing if we would refer
them as empty.
Also, the bug started with a problem where "empty" means "nothing after the
colon".
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
