Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:44:51 -0700 with message-id <87o9rlx51o....@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Closing inactive Policy bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #535577, regarding Add explicit policy for user-generated data on purge to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 535577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535577 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: debian-policy Version: 22.214.171.124 Severity: wishlist Currently, policy is rather unclear on what to do with user-generated content, such as the content of databases, on purge. Afaics, the only cases that are mentioned are those of conffiles and log files (both of which are to be removed at purge). I would argue that databses and such should NOT be removed on purge without asking the user explicitly The immediate cause of me filing this bug, was the apt-get upgrade I just did, which upgraded postgres-8.3 to postgres-8.4 on my system. However, postgres apparently doesn't automatically migrate the user data to the next version, but still postgress-8.3 was marked as candidate for autoremoval. When I autoremoved the packages (with --purge), I did't notice postgres-8.3 in the list, an I certainly didn't expect it to eat my databases without asking me first. Sure, I should have paid more attention, but I still think that we shoudl try to protect users like me from themselves liek this, and at least _ask_ before removing databases (and other data). Please let me know what you think, Bas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-rc3 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash debian-policy depends on no packages. debian-policy recommends no packages. Versions of packages debian-policy suggests: ii doc-base 0.9.3 utilities to manage online documen -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org control: usertag -1 +obsolete control: tag -1 +wontfix Russ Allbery and I did a round of in-person bug triage at DebConf17 and we are closing this bug as inactive. The reasons for closing fall into the following categories, from most frequent to least frequent: - issue is appropriate for Policy, there is a consensus on how to fix the problem, but preparing the patch is very time-consuming and no-one has volunteered to do it, and we do not judge the issue to be important enough to keep an open bug around; - issue is appropriate for Policy but there does not yet exist a consensus on what should change, and no recent discussion. A fresh discussion might allow us to reach consensus, and the messages in the old bug are unlikely to help very much; or - issue is not appropriate for Policy. If you feel this bug is still relevant and want to restart the discussion, you can re-open the bug. However, please consider instead opening a new bug with a message that summarises and condenses the previous discussion, updates the report for the current state of Debian, and makes clear exactly what you think should change. A lot of these old bugs have long side tangents and numerous messages, and that old discussion is not necessarily helpful for figuring out what Debian Policy should say today. -- Sean Whitton
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---